What is the basis for dong-seo optimizing the 100-degree judgement of quality?
What content is easily judged by its quality? Next, you can describe in detail what quality content is easily judged。
This topic is an old and inexcusable one for the station chief or the east china optimistic company. As the search engine algorithms are constantly being updated and becoming more intelligent, the criteria for judging quality content also vary at different stages. So what kind of content will be rated as good? I'll discuss it with you。
First, dong xeo optimists will start with a concept called “effective content output”. I've been asking questions from my clients and business friends. They all reflect the problem of creating content in an attempt to create content. But how many people have thought that what you created is really being searched for on the search engine? If there is no search, even if you get a good ranking, will it bring in traffic? So it's very important to change the content of the output. The measure of effectiveness can be based on the creation of content based on key words that can capture user needs, such as quartz tools, data analysis tools and site searches。
And then, “according to the subject matter”, if the main thrust of the east africa optimistics presentation of your title is not consistent with what you say, it will not last long, even if a certain amount of search flow is available in a short time. The title says what should be written. And, to the extent possible, meet the needs of users。
And when you're sure your article is about having user needs and content that addresses the needs of most people. So you created the good stuff, but can you say it's good? Not necessarily, because of the following factors。
Web open speed
The slowness with which dong zhengseo optimizes web pages are opened affects two points, one being the experience of user access to web pages, and the search engine, which is designed to better satisfy the search user experience, has made it difficult for users to access your website from the outset. As has been mentioned earlier by students of 100 degrees, mobile web pages are directly classified as garbage pages with speed greater than three seconds. Even if you had the best content and the difficulty of user access, it's not too much worth it。
The second point presented by dong xeo optimization is reptile capture, which is slow to open and difficult to access. And in terms of the search engine, it's also a program that runs, and it takes you one second to open a web page, and it takes 100 milliseconds to run at someone else's. I'm going to be one tenth of you. And you took out the reptiles that could have picked up a web page for you. I would have adjusted the capture scale of your website to save resources to capture more pages, and less to capture, and less to get on the aoshima site. What about ranking and traffic?
Do you really think the search engine can't recognize it today? For example, content blocks themselves, which were originally set in black or dark grey fonts, are very good. However, for some other purposes, the setting of light grey or more closely aligned colours to the web background does not take advantage of user experience. It also cannot be counted as a quality content。
For example, too small font sizes, too tight paragraphs between text and even superstitions affect user experience to some extent。
