Recently, a commentator, whitestone, commented in newsweek, had the fastest nurse, zhang shuihua, once again become the focus of online debate, and some netizens said, "as long as she has great talent, employees use online public opinion to push themselves into the green light, and so onRuleIf not, it becomes a binding framework for ordinary people.”
It is interesting to think that the comments of whitestone have led to a confrontation between online opinion and, in essence, the idea of ideal governance and reality. Netizens are alert to privilege, yesEquityThe firmness of justice is precisely a reflection of the pressing need for discipline on the part of those in the workplace, while some of the netizens who agree with the whitestone proposal focus on the neglect of human values。
In fact, the debate among netizens has never been about whether individuals can pursue themselvesHobbies"how individuals find love and work in their daily workBalanceDot”. In this circular, the hospital concerned also stressed that “subject to compliance with the law and without prejudice to their duties, employees are encouraged to develop their personal interests”, thus maintaining both the non-violability of the rules and the flexibility of the rules。
In contrast to other areas, in the areas of public services such as health, education and so forth, rules are an insurmountable bottom line, and any accommodation outside the rules can bury risks to the public interest. In this controversy of public opinion, the proponents of zhang shuihua were right in the belief that "genius should not be bound by the system", while the opponents were of the opinion that "other colleagues cannot take on additional tasks for their own personal preferences"ResponsibilityAct. These two different voices are inherently rooted in the difference between freedom and responsibility。
Zhang shuihua's career as a nurse at sanjia hospital is to save lives and injuries. The unique nature of her position determines that her shift will be directly related to hospital order and will even affect the patient's safety. Zhang shuihua's violation of his right to leave on false grounds was also clearly indicated in the hospital's penalty circular. What we cannot accept is violations of the law, not denial of the pluralistic development of individuals。
For individuals, a truly responsible attitude is the choice between love and reality. Or, like professional athletes, focus on the tracks after saving enough capital. It is the most pragmatic account of duty and hobby that is either to act with due diligence and to release the passion of one's passion from the rest of the world during his or her free time. In the case of employers, the attitude of allowing employees to develop their own hobby, subject to the relevant regulations, should be made clear. In any institution, there would be a few employees with special talents, and if employers were to really use this particular resource, it would be crucial to establish a fair and equitable rules system, rather than private special care that violated the rules。
In real life, managers need to give their employees the full range of training needs, but they also need to take good measure and balance themselves. If an employee converts his or her specialty into a special privilege in the workplace and requires the unconditional cooperation of the organization or colleague, such self-serving behaviour not only destroys the working environment, but also creates avoidable occupational contradictions that affect the normal work of all。
When an individual's dream collides with professional responsibility, the rule is the only fair rule. Only when more and more people are able to achieve value in the context of compliance can we find the best balance between equity and vitality. Let every love have the soil to grow, and every responsibility has a strong meaning。
