Website: homewifi coverage guide
Privately, the market for civilian wifi routers is now completely on the wrong side. The antenna is growing, and the power of the launch is increasing. I'm not sure what i'm talking about. And regardless of the impact that a large launch power may have on the body, technically the wifi characteristics, why wifi is not suitable for a large power launch。
First, an empty bandwidth is a shared bandwidth。
The shared range is wirelessly accessible, depending on launch power and wear and tear. The higher the frequency, the greater the wear and tear. The greater the power of the launch, the more equipment enters this large hub to share the empty bandwidth. Not a shared bandwidth for the client with the ap belt, but for all wireless devices in the area. Increased launch power runs counter to the principle of network isolation of larger broadcasting domains。
Second, the same frequency of interference is severe。
There is no reason why the isa frequency band limits launch power. It is to limit the same frequency of interference. The same frequency of interference is limited to a few dozen metres. Within a small range, the probability of multiple simultaneous launch points is low. Increased launch power meant that two families far away would interfere with each other's network. Considerable deterioration of the network environment。
Third, interference
The greater the power of the launch, the greater the interference that the routers themselves add to when they work. In fact, the most important thing about wireless communication is not the size of the signal, but the relationship。
If the signal received is strong, but accompanied by the same noise signal, it will not be able to communicate。
== sync, corrected by elderman ==
So, is there a solution? It's true that the business environment is already using mature multi-ap cellular cover。
Some people would say that business is not for domestic use, right
You used to use 100m broadband only for commercial use. There's nothing inappropriate for home, it's just the price. As long as the price is low and household users can afford it, there is no need to be too proud not to use it。
In fact, many people are already covered by multiaps at home, but the results are not good and the latest aps need to be chosen manually. Why
Because the home routers don't have a function, which is ap roaming。
No ap roaming, even if two home routers set up the same sid, even if they're all connected to the lan mouth, shut down dhcp just for ap. The equipment doesn't think there's any connection between these two sids. It's not going to be active on the stronger signal. Only when the distance is so far away, the signal is so poor and the bag is so bad, the unbridled disconnection leads to a stronger signal. And this search isn't looking for a stronger signal than the next sid, but it's sort of like these aps are independent networks, sort of according to the intensity of the signal. Many times because other ssid you don't have a password, it happens to be connected to another router with ssid。
Commercial ap, with a centralized "ap controller" called ac, can control ap to achieve seamless roaming. And because it's a commercial product, it's expensive. Because most ap functions are replaced by ac, they are called thin ap, fit ap。
But after years of development, the prices of ac and fit ap have finally fallen to a level that household users can afford
Of course i appreciate itTp-lInkI don't know。
In fact, the home router can buy one for a few dozen dollarsIt's impossible before ink shows up. So a long time ago, there were many computer users in their homes, and telecommunications gave them a solution like that. The switch is allowed, and each computer is dialed separately. There was no tp-lInk, home users can afford exchanges at most. Most of them may still be used as hubs, and switches are not available。
Okay, don't talk nonsense, understand, use tp-lThe ink solution, how much it takes。
First of all, you have to have a big house, a normal router signal that doesn't cover. Either you buy a very expensive ac1900, eight antennas, and there's no big dead end to it. Or we'll modify the antenna, rewire the circuit, and get a superpower. Or, in the way i admire it, multi-ap hive cover。
Change this road pass off。
It's a very good signal. It's a great antenna. How much is it
Let's see this
This stuff is google's drumming home router. Signal testing to see linus videos
The price of this stuff is 1000+
Well, since your family can only rely on more than a thousand routers, then ask buddha to protect it. So let's look at another solution, isn't it possible to get better coverage with less money。
Ac + ap programme。
One has a line by the device, 30 bucks a piece。
Tp-lInk ac100 this is an ac, the price is 200 dollars apiece。
A poe switch is about $100-300. Depends on the number of ports you have. Port number > = ap number is sufficient。
Poe is optional. Because ap usually supports the poe power supply or the plug-in power supply。
Some fit ap。
Basically, two can achieve better coverage than the ac1900, and more than three can achieve a coverage that can't be achieved by any expensive ac1900。
It was clear which of the cost calculations would be made。
And you can focus on the bedroom, which means you can guarantee 100% signal strength where you're often online. Instead of a wireless router, it can only be placed in the center, otherwise it cannot be fully covered. So there's not enough signal strength in a place like the bedroom。
The experience of internet access as a result of this is also indistinguishable. And because it's an ac+ap program. So multiple aps are automatically managed and can travel seamlessly. It's not going to cause management trouble because of more aps。
Over。
