The core reason for many of the candidates' chronically low scores is not bad writing, but old materials, broken answers, unable to keep upIt's timeI don't know. In 2026, there was a major innovation in the province's competitive examination, the career review, and interviewsNew quality productivityIt became an absolute core point of consideration, running through sub-issues, essays, interviews。
In the past, the candidates were prepared to build up old material, recite all-powerful words and answer questions using fixed templates. This year, however, the theme is more relevant to current trends, focusing on the core elements of science, technology and innovation, industrial upgrading, landscape and digital empowerment, and focusing on the ability of candidates to understand and apply current political hotspots, with empty templates, old materials, and simply failing。
Many have mistakenly assumed that new quality productivity is a deep theory that is difficult to grasp. In fact, the focus of the study has been fixed and the core has been structured around three main dimensions: first, the fall of science, technology and innovation, the rejection of formalization of r & d, and the setting up of civic and industrial scenarios; second, the upgrading of digital capabilities to break the pains of traditional industries; and third, the matching of talent and industry and the building blocks of development. All the answers and writings revolve around these three points, so that they can achieve a steady high score。
The argument is never a pile of material, but rather a close, precise and well-defined response. It's hard to remember, it doesn't understand the core of the hotspot, it doesn't combine material conversion, and it's always only average. Many of the candidates' examinations were empty, seemingly high, and were completely off the page。
It is very difficult for self-study to be precise in the direction of the issue, given the rapid renewal of current politics. If you want to argue for quick points, you have to keep up with the latest points, have an exclusive answer logic, and be usefulHigh score materialI don't know。
The candidates who don't break the political hotspots, who don't change the theoretical answers, and whose materials accumulate in a tumultuous manner, can learn the hotspots from the malt system. Exactly extracts the 2026 mandatory political points, which are accompanied by an exclusive response template and written material, to avoid recitation and to give high marks to the argument。
Interactive message: are you saying you're still doing something old? One comment mark is corrected in time
