Last weekend at the school game, i got it in my place."DiplomaIt doesn't meanLevel of knowledge"the argument was prepared for a whole week, and the result was stung by the other side for 10 minutes. It's not until we get backThe point of this argument is not in the diploma itself, but in the words "for."I don't know. A lot of people came up and started to argue that "diploma is paper" and "knowledge is self-learning" and it's all going in a different direction. What you have to catch is that, even if i admit that a diploma is some kind of proof of knowledge, it "can't represent" -- it means full parity, which is not established in any field of experience。
What's the difference between diplomas and knowledge
When i was preparing, i looked into a lot of information and found a very solid fact: most of the posts are first-hand with a degree, but when they actually do work, they're the only ones who have a jobThe crack between "competence" and "diploma" was revealedI don't know. I worked next door for a graduate degree to do data analysis, three years, and sql wrote better than my graduate students, but he got offer with a graduate degree. This is not an example. I was thereMootFour times, the phrase "the diploma is a certificate of access, not a measure of ability" was used to pull each other into my frame。
The key is for the jury to understand that the diploma is, at best, a "minimum ticket", which only proves that you have passed a standardized test at a certain point in time, and that there is no equivalence between the level of knowledge that is dynamic, interdisciplinary and integrated in solving practical problems。
How can you prove knowledge without a diploma
I was stuck at the beginning, and i figured it out:The hardest part is not to prove that a diploma is useless, but to prove that a diploma is not needed。I've given three examples: the programmer in the open source community who contributes the top 50 codes in the world, does not have an undergraduate diploma; the non-genetics have any knowledge of craftsCertificateIt can't be finished; a high school student solves the actual irrigation problem with mathematical modelling for the town. And when three examples came out, they said, "you're all one," and i said, "well, can you give me a case in which a diploma would certainly represent a level of knowledge?" the whole room was quiet for about five seconds。
What i said ended: we were not talking about whether a diploma should be needed, but whether it should be considered the only ruler of knowledge. You can't say "no" to "no" as it is. Too often, the winner of the debate depends not on how much you say, but on whether you take the right to define。
