Property makes you sign for maintenance money? Don't sign it yet! These five questions are clear
The property came to the door and the owner signed off on the funds for the specialized maintenance of the home, which many people wanted to sign. Remember: don't sign it yet! Ask these five questions and hold the hundreds of thousands of maintenance workers in the neighborhood
First, what are the funds for maintenance: the “house pension” for sexual intercourse at the time of the purchase of the house, which is dedicated to the repair of common parts such as roofs, outer walls, elevators, fire fighting, public pipe networks, common facilities, not property money, but money shared by all owners。
Before signing, you have to verify these five things:
First, what exactly is the maintenance project? Is it maintenanceUse of fundsScope
The funds for maintenance can only be made public. The owner's house leaked water and his own door and window were damaged and not used。
Property needs to be clear: maintenance, failure, with site photos, test reports. If it was only routine cleaning and minor repairs, the property costs would have been incurred and no maintenance funds could have been used。
Second, how much is the budget? Any details
One sum cannot be given. To get the full quote: materials, labour, transportation, management, how much each。
The main question is: are there many prices? Which construction unit? Whether the bidding process was publicized or whether there would be a high-priced offer and an overstatement of the amount of work performed。
Thirdly, what are the construction programmes, work schedules, acceptance criteria
When work starts, how long it is done, what standards are met for repairs and how to return to work if they are not qualified。
Many of the sub-districts were poorly repaired for short periods of time because they did not have agreed acceptance standards and the quality of work was not limited。
Fourth, how are the funds settled, whether they are pre-allocated or are actually written off upon completion? Who does the audit
Question: do you want to pay for the work or do you want to complete the receipt and inspection before settlement。
Upon completion, whether all invoices and the list of accounts should be published in the subdistricts. In order to prevent overestimation, how much was spent, the balance was returned to the maintenance fund account。
Fifthly, is the voting procedure in conformity, and is there any risk of false signatures
Funds for maintenance are used to meet the mandatory voting ratio。
It is important to see whether the voting list of owners is true or not. Keep an eye on the property industry for signatures and votes. You have the right to have access to the voting records。
There are two important reminders:
1. Signature does not amount to unconditional consent. If the programme is vague and the budget is unclear, you can refuse to sign and ask the property to complete the information before voting。
2. The owner's representative may supervise the construction on site; upon completion, the owner has the right to have access to all the accounts。
Many sub-districts have hundreds of millions of maintenance funds, which are difficult to make up once they have been misused and spent easily. This home pension is spent every penny on a knife。
In conclusion:
The property allows the signature to draw on the maintenance funds and does not rush to write. Verification of the scope of the project, budget breakdown, construction programme, settlement audit, owner vote, all five clearly reconsidered, and the preservation of the housing pension shared by all owners。
1. Have you used maintenance funds in your districts? How's the construction going
2. Do you think the hardest part of the use of maintenance funds is price or supervision
