The owner of a buick vehicle accidentally hit one in the back when he turned backRolls-royceAs a result of the damage to the front right of the front of rolls-royce's car, maintenance costs were over $40,000. An incident certificate issued by the traffic police found the owner of the buick to be fully responsible for the accident. On 30 september, red star journalists were informed by the chinese tribune network that the people's court of sanya city, hainan province, had handed down a judgement to the people's court in the zenit zone, ordering the insurance company insured by the owner of the buick vehicle to pay more than $50,000 for the maintenance of the owner of the rolls-royce vehicle and the cost of the trailer。
Rusles gustte, the profile is irrelevant to the news
The judgement documents show that, on the morning of 28 january 2023, when one of the men drove a buick to a hotel section in the city of hainan sanya after 90 days, a collision struck with the rolles gust car driven by lee, causing damage to the right front of rolles. According to the traffic police division of sanya public securityTraffic accidentsAccording to the certificate of determination (summary procedure), the owner of the rolls-royce car, lee, was not responsible for the accident. Later, li entrusted an assessment of the loss of the vehicle to a company in the amount of $46,600. According to lee, as hainan had no authorized repair point for the gustre car brand, it was necessary to entrust the transport company with towing the vehicle back to jilin and paying $17,000 for the trailer. On 10 april 2023, li sent the vehicle to jilin for maintenance, for a total cost of $46,600 for the maintenance of the vehicle's former safety pole and headlights。
It was found that one of the remaining vehicles had been insured by an insurance company for a commercial triad with a maximum liability of $1 million and that the accident occurred during the insurance period. After that, the owner of the rolls-royces brought the buick owner and the insurance company insured by the buick to courtClaimsRelated losses。
The court held that the case was a motor vehicle traffic accident liability dispute and that the faulting party should bear the corresponding civil liability according to the degree of fault. With respect to vehicle maintenance costs of $46,600, the corresponding vehicle loss price assessment report and maintenance invoice are supported as evidence. With regard to the assessment fee of $2,000, as the vehicle in question was actually repaired sufficient to establish the specific loss of the vehicle, which was neither a cost of property damage incurred as a result of a traffic accident nor a necessary and reasonable expense, the assessment fee of $2,000 claimed by li is not supported. With regard to the tow truck fee of $17,000, the court held that hainan had no brand-name authorized repair point, and that the plaintiff, li, could also choose the authorized maintenance point in the province close to the site of the accident, whereas the plaintiff had towed the vehicle to jilin, far from the site of the accident, which was an increase in the loss and burden on the defendant, and therefore, from the point of view of fairness, had a discretionary fee of $5,000。
In the end, the court ordered an insurance company to pay lee, the owner of the rolls-royce car, a sum of $51,600。
