Standard code download profile and preview gb t50438-2007: security of metro operationsEvaluation criteria. PDF brief:
Gb t50438-2007 is the national standard of china and is known as the " safety assessment standards for urban subway operations " . This standard targets all aspects of urban metro operations, including operations organization, facility equipment, personnel management, security management, emergency response, etc., and provides systematic and comprehensive evaluation and regulation of the security management of metro operations。
The standards aim to improve the level of security management of urban metro operations and, through the evaluation of the various components of metro operations, to identify security risks and weaknesses in operations, thus developing improvements to improve operational efficiency and ensure the safety and stability of passengers. It applies to the operating units of the urban metro, including metro companies, operating administrations and related regulatory authorities。
Gb t50438-2007 covers subjects of evaluation, evaluation indicator systems, evaluation methodology, evaluation rating and application of evaluation results. The implementation of this standard will facilitate the continuous improvement of urban metro operations and the upgrading of security management。
Gb t50438-2007: safety assessment standards for metro operations. PDF, part preview:
25 october 2007
In accordance with the requirements of the “notice for the publication of the state standard scheme for the construction of two-year works and the revision plan” (sign no. 85), this standard is to be prepared by beijing city metro company limited in conjunction with the relevant units. In the course of this process, the * group has been subjected to extensive research, careful review of the practice, reference to relevant international standards and advanced standards from abroad, and has been reviewed and finalized on the basis of a wide range of comments. The main elements of this standard are: 1. General requirements and procedures for safety evaluation; 2. Basic safety evaluation (including: safety management evaluation, operational organization and management evaluation, equipment facility evaluation and external environmental evaluation); and 3. Accident risk level assessment. This standard is administered by the ministry of construction and the beijing city metro operator ltd. Is responsible for the interpretation of specific technical elements. In the course of implementation, units are requested to take a practical approach to learning from their experiences and to send comments and suggestions to beijing metro operating ltd. (at: no. 2 of the north river outside the western gate, ** **: 100044), beijing, for information. The main unit* of this standard, the reference unit* and the main drafter: the main unit*: beijing city metro operator limited beijing city institute for labour protection sciences, tianjin city underground railway company, upper haiti iron operator ltd., china institute of safety and production sciences, guangzhou city underground railway company, chief drafter: wang sook-min, yang yu, zhang jun, chen guanghua, maohua, wan woo, hsiang, zhao zheng zheng, zheng zhi hung, chen xiao, east
Gb50086-2015 standard technical instructions for geotechnical anchor poles and spray concrete support. PDF18. 3 basic security risk level
In order to implement the “security first, prevention first” approach, to strengthen the supervision and management of the general operation of the metro system, to scientifically evaluate the conditions and capabilities of the safe operation of the metro system and the performance of the safe operation, to regularize and institutionalize the assessment of the state of safety in the operation of the metro system, to promote the improvement of the level of management of the safe operation of the metro system, and to establish the standards of the final version。
1. 0. 3 provisions of these standards shall be implemented when conducting security status assessments of metro systems
Rapid, mass, popularized, power-trapped, completely closed-line orbital traffic in cities. The lines are usually located in underground tunnels, on the ground and on the bridge。
2. 0. 2 car fleet setofcars
Vehicles operating independently in orbit in fixed basic mobile units group
No unacceptable risk of harm
Risks are granted only if risk reduction costs more than improvements made。
2. 6. 6 negligible risk negligible risk
There is no longer an acceptable risk of improvement。
3. 1. 1 this standard is evaluated by a relatively independent metro operating line
3. 1. 1 the criteria are evaluated on a relatively independent metro line, which is subject to separate evaluations when the metro operator has the right to operate multiple lines
3. 2. 1 the safety evaluation system for metro operations consists of a basic safety assessment and an accident risk water level assessment. The basic security evaluation includes: security management evaluation, operational organization and management evaluation, vehicle system evaluation, power supply system evaluation, fire and management evaluation, circuit and orbital system evaluation, evaluation of electromechanical equipment, evaluation of communications equipment, signal evaluation, equipment evaluation, environmental and equipment control system evaluation, automatic ticketing system evaluation, vehicle segment and integrated base evaluation, civil engineering evaluation, external environmental evaluation。
3. 3. 1 the evaluation organization consists of an overall evaluation team and professional evaluation teams by evaluation module. The overall team leader is responsible for the overall evaluation and evaluation findings, and the team leaders are responsible for the evaluation of this evaluation module. The evaluation team shall be composed of personnel from the security management of the subway, technicians with the technical skills of the subway and high-level functional titles, and security evaluators qualified for security evaluation
3. 3. 2 pre-preparation shall conform to the following: yes
Develop evaluation programmes. The evaluation programme should include the following: 1) identification of the target audience and scope of the evaluation; 2) prioritization of the evaluation according to the characteristics of the subject. 2 plan to evaluate progress. Development of a catalogue of drawings, documents, information, archives and data required from metro operators。
3. 3. 3 qualitative and quantitative evaluations shall meet the following requirements:
3. 3. 3 qualitative and re-evaluated response stations for the following aqueous water: based on a survey of the type, number and operational status of projects in each evaluation module, a sample sample sample sample was selected from the site. Sampling quantities may not be less than those in the public format (3. 3. 3)。
(b) total sample size n1. 3 qualitative and quantitative 4 scores for the various evaluation modules based on the identified evaluation projects and their value。
1 general level of risk for basic safety evaluation as defined in chapter 18 of this standard; 2 general level of risk for accident assessment as defined in chapter 19 of this standard。
3. 3. 6* the security assessment report for metro operations shall meet the following requirements:
1 evaluation reports should be comprehensive, structured, data packaged, recommendations feasible and evaluation findings objective and impartial. The main elements of the evaluation report should include: 1) the evaluation of the basics of the enterprise, the scope of the evaluation and the focus of the evaluation; 2) the evaluation of basic safety and accident levels and the level of risk; and 3) the refinement of observations and recommendations. 3 the report on the safety assessment of metro operations would be useful to use paper carriers, which would be complemented by electronic carriers。
3. 4. 1 the full score for each evaluation project is 100. Real scores for evaluation projects
3. 4. 1 the full score for each evaluation project is 100. Real scores for evaluation projects
3. 4. 3 the evaluation sub-evaluations should meet the following requirements:
When the evaluation meets the requirements, the full score is obtained. The evaluation content is partially compliant or the evaluation content does not meet the requirements, subject to deductions where applicable. The evaluation shall not be divided if it does not meet the requirements. If there are gaps in the evaluation project, the true score for the missing evaluation project shall be shared. ]
4. 1. 1 safety management evaluations include 11 evaluation projects, comprising safety management agencies and personnel, safe production responsibility, safety management objectives, safe production inputs, accident emergency response system, safety training education, safety information exchange, safe production promotion, accident hazard management, safe work practices, safety inspection system, etc., divided into 100 points. 4. 1. 2 the security management evaluation may determine the content and value of the evaluation in the format of appendix a and develop evaluation forms。
4. 2 security administration and personnel
4. 2. 1 assessments of security management bodies and personnel include security management bodies, security management
1) on-site inspection of security administration personnel* and files of security administration agencies (2). The qualification of security managers shall meet the following requirements:
1. Strict eligibility criteria should be established
2) the security manager shall pass the pre-entry test and the most up-to-date test shall be carried out during the period of validity. 2. 1 evaluation methodology 1) access to standard eligibility documents. 2) inspection of the examination records of security managers
2) the security manager shall pass the pre-entry test and the most up-to-date test shall be carried out during the period of validity。
The spi evaluation includes three sub-headings for the management of the spi files. The evaluation of the principals should meet the following requirements:
4. 3. 1 the evaluation of responsibility for safe production includes key managers, safety managers
1) the principals shall be responsible for safe production. 2) the responsibility for safe production should be implemented. 2 evaluation methodology access to documents of the primary responsibility for human security production accountability files of the operations management。
1) the heads of departments shall establish and ensure responsibility for safe production. (2) general safety managers shall establish and effectively implement responsibility for safe production. 3) other practitioners should have safety responsibility and practical implementation. 2 evaluation methodology。
: evaluation criteria should establish a sound ppe file? 1 evaluation methodology access to the ppe file。
The evaluation of safety management objectives includes three sub-items on safe production control indicators and the resource requirements for achieving safety targets at all levels. The evaluation of safe production control indicators should meet the following requirements:
Three sub-items of production target, resources required to achieve target。
4. 4. 2 the evaluation of safe production control indicators shall meet the following requirements:
Indicators of safe production control should be developed. 2) a database of safe production control indicators should be established. 2. Evaluation methodology
4. 4. 3 assessment of safe production objectives at all levels shall meet the following requirements:
The objective of safe production should be established at all levels. 2) remedial measures should be developed for failed safe production objectives. 3) the resources needed to achieve the goal of safe production should be allocated. 2. 1 evaluation methodology 1) access to safe production target files at all levels. 2) on-site inspection of equipment, facilities to achieve safe production objectives
The objective of safe production should be established at all levels. 2) remedial measures should be developed for non-achievement of safe production objectives 3) the resources needed to achieve safe production objectives should be allocated
4. 5. 1 assessment of safe production candidates includes 3 options for a safe investor security system, a safe investor performance system, and a safety reward and penalty system
1) the person shall have the funds necessary for safe working conditions. (2) the decision-making bodies, principals or individual investors shall certify the funds necessary for safe working conditions and shall be held responsible for the consequences of the lack of funds required for full production. Evidence
Yes, financial security funds are invested。
4. 5. 3 the implementation of an evaluation by a safe investor shall meet the following requirements:
1) a substantial amount of special funds for safety shall be allocated each year. 2) funds shall be allocated for the provision of labour protection supplies and training in safe production. 3) participation in social insurance for industrial injuries in accordance with the law. 2 evaluation methodology: access to certificates of investment and financial security funds provided by the unit's finances for safety investors, injury insurance, labour insurance supplies, security training, etc. The evaluation of the security awards system should be in accordance with the following two formulas:
Standard downloads of gb/t 50125-2010 look at the certificates of the investor for safety, injury insurance, labour insurance supplies, security training, etc. Provided by the unit's finances, and the financial security funds are accounted for. 4. The evaluation of the system of security rewards and penalties shall meet the following requirements: 1 evaluation standard 1) a system of security examinations and sanctions should be established 2) a system of security examinations and sanctions should be put in place. 2 evaluation methodology
1) there should be a system of security examinations and rewards and penalties. 2) the system of security examinations and sanctions should be put in place. 2 evaluation methodology
4. 6 accident emergency response system
4. 6. 1 evaluations of emergency response systems include pre-positioning, emergency response teams, emergency response equipment and emergency response personnel and support systems for relief equipment, emergency response training and emergency response exercises, pre-project management, and six sub-items of emergency incident disposal evaluation for the year
2 evaluation methodology。
4. 6. 3 evaluations of emergency response organizations should meet the following requirements:
1) the agency for the organization of accident emergency response shall be established. 2) the emergency chain of command shall specify the composition of the emergency chain of command of the head office and sub-company and the relevant information thereof. 3) it should be specified that the eert constituted the db23/t 1496. 21-2021 standards for the equipment of labour protection, part 21: engineering construction personnel. PDF, and that the head and composition of the erc should be identified. 2 evaluation methodology 4. 6. 4 emergency relief equipment and emergency response personnel availability and availability of relief equipment
