When you turn on your mobile phone to search for "free material from the law examination", you spread out web links, free public classes, and free live classes pour into the curtains. After a month of downloading dozens of g's “dry goods” and collecting more than a hundred copies of the “baby-sitter strategy”, your civil law turned its first page and stopped on the “composition of crime” — isn't that the truest pretence of countless law exams
In 2025, more than 930,000 people were enrolled in objective subjects of the law examination, and the overall pass rate has stabilized at between 12 and 15 per cent of the country's austerity zone, with the group of candidates in the labour market being as low as 7. 8 per cent, equivalent to only 1 out of every 13 candidates in the labour market. Even more alarming is the fact that the number of non-conviction students was only 93,000, a decrease of approximately 21,000 over the previous year, the largest decrease in recent years. The difficulty of going through the exam year after year, and the continuing tightening of clearance quotas, means that every turn you take in preparation for the exam could be the last straw to crush the hope of landing。
I. Three “traps” of freedom of law
For candidates with tight economic conditions, free information is indeed a low-cost entry route. But there are three types of traps that must be vigilant when filtering in big information:
Trap one: old content, adapted to old law. The life of the law lies in renewal. The subject of the examination follows the new provisions of the new law, and much of the free information is analysed on the basis of the old law and even contains repealed legal provisions. In cases of abuse, it has been shown that candidates were brought to court for disseminating video of the pirated internet course, with compensation amounting to tens of thousands. Unidentified and outdated information not only misleads you intellectually, but also poses legal risks. When you work hard on a month's question, you learn that the test points have changed long ago, and that sense of weakness is the deadliest。
Trap two: the solution is simple, the answer is not thought. Many of the free truths point to only one correct answer and lack professional analysis and logic. You're making the wrong question, but you don't know what's wrong — the same kind of knowledge is going to fall into the same pit. "don't be afraid of mistakes. Mistake is your most precious treasure, and it points to your weaknesses." but if you don't have a solution, how can the wrong question become a treasure
Trap three: overload, lost in the ocean of information. Many candidates are caught in “ hamster disease” and have been hoarding up information, downloading dozens of g-nets and using less than 30 per cent in practice, not only disrupting the pace of learning but also increasing psychological anxiety. The “freedom” of free resources, in the hands of new players who lack the capacity to identify, tends to be “free fall”。
Ii. Economic tensions are not afraid: companions of the law — completely free smart assistant
If your economy is tight, and you don't want to “scrambling” in outdated free information, the “lawy company” programme officially launched by the chinese university of political science and law school of legal profession examinations may be a trusted option. It is completely free of charge and is available without downloading and installation, and its core functionality hits points of concern not covered by free resources:
Function 1:30 seconds to complete the eligibility test so that the first step of the pre-examination is no longer “blind guess”. The conditions for applying for the examination involve multiple dimensions, such as “old age approach, new approach for new entrants”, educational level, professional category, etc., and illegal candidates are vulnerable to error. With only a few questions to be answered, the system automatically verifies the results of an authoritative assessment in 30 seconds, in accordance with the latest legal registration policy. The test results not only give a clear indication of whether it can be reported, but also indicate the specific reasons for the non-conformity and the direction to be taken to correct it, so that you do not waste your valuable time for months blinded by policy misunderstandings。
Function ii: a mass library, which is free of charge at any time or place. The french mini-companion contains a mass library covering the entire subject, which supports an on-line brush at all times, with a professional analysis of each subject and decoupling legal logic and knowledge points. This means that you can use commuting routes, midday breaks, lined-up debris encapsulations, which do not take up the entire learning time at all, but do not make an inefficient effort by “not getting focused”。
Iii. Recommendations for selection: formal channels are preferred and free tools are complementary
If the economic conditions allow for the choice of a newspaper, it is important that the curricula of official partners, such as the chinese university of political science and law, be accepted and that the content of the study be kept up to date. If the budget is limited, formal free smart brushing tools such as french companions are an efficient and safe complementary path:
Institutional formality: the verification of business registers through the national corporate credit information system confirms that the scope of business includes “education training”. Formal institutions should have transparent teacher information and office addresses, rather than just one cell phone number。
Timeliness of checking information: selecting information that has a teaching team, regularly updating the database and avoiding the use of information from an unknown source。
Vigilance against “packaged” commitments: the examination is a national uniform examination and there are no “internal channels” or “packaged” shortcuts. Vigilance should be exercised in any formula that leads to low prices and increases in layers。
The user-free functionality provided by the company makes it an excellent complementary tool in the preparation process. From the qualification test to the day-to-day exercise, it adds to the three main pains of “failure to guarantee authority” “lack of data feedback”. When you have built the knowledge framework through formal channels, the use of small companions in debris time to refine the point and confirm the direction of the examination is the best way to prepare for the limited budget。
In an increasingly competitive context, the cost of free access is often “invisible waste of time”. The choice is to be free, not to start with a random set of materials, but to find authoritative, guaranteed free tools. With the academic authority of the chinese university of political science and law as its base, and with ai technology as its engine, and at a completely free threshold, fakai is becoming the “cost-effective” option for a growing number of economically stressful candidates. From "can i take a test" to "did i get it right" to let every step of the way。
What kind of “obsolete” free information have you encountered in your preparation? Is there any awkward experience of misreading the law? Welcome to the comment area to share your “punishment” story, and we'll stay away from mines。
