Recently, the eighth peter drucker global forum, held in austria, brought together leading global management experts, academics and entrepreneurs to demonstrate the modalities of an “entrepreneurship society”, in which haile was discussed as a case of “debating bureaucracy” and achieving entrepreneurship for all. There was public opinion that the haile model provided an effective way of organizing towards the “entrepreneurship society” espoused by drook, and what was its role in building an “entrepreneurship society” in the immediate context of the rapid spread of the internet? In this regard, the chinese network correspondent interviewed mr. Roqingqi, a senior member of the parler consulting company。
Europe's 4. 0 system still suffers from its own shortcomings
Chinanet: the theme of the forum, “emergency society”, is how to enter an entrepreneurial society and how to use innovation and entrepreneurship to achieve renewed growth, at the heart of the european debate of eminent management experts and entrepreneurs. The forum is a microcosm of economic and social development in europe, and what is the subject and content of this discussion that reflects a request
罗 清 清 清 清 创业 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。 。
Germany's industrial 4. 0 system still suffers from a huge introspective flaw, with the core of the system being “mass = information”, all of which is written down by data, manufacturing processes becoming a huge data-motion process, that is, industry becomes a subcategory of the information industry, and industry itself precisely controls the unprecedented space of industrial processes. My question now is that the place of demand in industry is often not determined by the core logic of “mass = information”, which is the industry's 4. 0, so that industry becomes a demand imitator or similar。
The stability of this seemingly highly intelligent, high-speed manufacturing, large-scale control industrial system can only be seen as an enhanced version of the control theory applied in the larger industrial context, which in the great era of interconnectivity was not control and communication in supply, but rather control and communication in demand and supply. In this sense, european industry 4. 0 and the transition to an entrepreneurial society can be seen as two questions, not two answers, in the process of restructuring europe’s industrial shape。
The key to future entrepreneurship is the form of organization that creates new factors of production in the organization
The chinese network “established society” concept is derived from innovation and entrepreneurship, published by druk in 1985, which envisaged that “innovation, entrepreneurship will be a normal, relatively stable and continuous job in an entrepreneurial society”. In your view, today's social entrepreneurship is not just the creation of new enterprises or industries, but the creation of new organizational patterns, and the current digital technologies are accelerating the transformation of society, and what exactly is the form of organization that an “entrepreneurship society” needs
The current concept of “innovation and entrepreneurship” in the concept of entrepreneurship society or entrepreneurial organization is confusing. Innovation and entrepreneurship, described by drook in innovation and entrepreneurship, are operational guides for organizational innovation entrepreneurship, innovation and entrepreneurship are invented as a management-based conceptual entity, and the subjects of innovation and entrepreneurship can organize innovation and entrepreneurship based on the practical dimensions provided by this group of conceptual entities. Innovation and entrepreneurship, which are spreading in many current economies, refer more to macro-coordination activities in which economies lead societies to tap into domestic demand in economies, which are characterized by the mass and phased nature of social action, while innovation and entrepreneurship oriented towards the internet age are quite different from the two above。
The creativity of social groups becomes a factor of production in the third knowledge category, following the knowledge and expertise of the organization, and traditional factors of production have become factors of knowledge production. Barriers to new roles, so the key to innovation and entrepreneurship today and in the future is to find new forms of organization to organize larger, new factors of production. Using old forms of organization to organize old factors of production and old forms of organization to organize new factors of production has only a certain economic significance. Innovation and entrepreneurship in the internet era is a daily practice that new types of organizations must have, and not, as history and today have, innovation and entrepreneurship have been a scarce pattern of pursuit. Of course, the most important objective of our current innovation and entrepreneurship is to create new forms of organization with a daily pattern of innovation and entrepreneurship。
"innovation dilemma" is still misleading europe
Chinanet: even the innovative silicon valley “carpentry enterprise” in the united states, which will gradually lose its original innovation and entrepreneurship after growing up, is the “innovation dilemma” of the global business community. Unleashing the creativity of the staff and instilling a source of dynamism in the company, unleashing its energy is the focus of this forum. How can europe, which is a major global conglomerate of large enterprises, reshape the innovation and entrepreneurial capacity of large enterprises as the most important topic for the future of the management theory community in europe and in developed countries as a whole, effectively address the dilemma of innovation in the light of the theoretical collisions offered by the forum
Ro qingqi: the internet's horn does not wake up large organizations in developed countries such as europe, where the dominant global industrial forces have become the de facto right-hand opportunist bastion, and from the information released by the forum, the theoretical path to the reform of these large industrial organizations is to relax internal controls and revitalize the organization. In my view, this is no innovation at all, at best an “alteration in the dilemma” of large organizations, which is only a phase in the stimulantization of large organizations。
We have seen the resurgence of dogmaticism in the midst of a noisy era of transition, which has become a tranquilizer for organizations afraid of transition, the new realities of the current operating environment that should be recognized by large european organizations, the global market size of large organizations in developed countries that have been closed, the basic monopolistic patterns that are now relying on: economies of scale and scope for core capabilities by crossing organizational borders, large organizations that are more of a retail agency for knowledge creation systems in developed countries than they are managing food, but the vision is far from sound, and the distribution of large-scale intellectual innovation has become a reality。
The innovation of the times is not just a move away from the inherent limitations of the organization, but a re-structured goal of going beyond our decisive factor of production capacity to organize technological innovation and social innovation, which is a new “innovation dilemma” for large organizations, and the “innovation dilemma” within the framework of the former system of large organizations has become a new trap for innovation transformation, which is misleading the current and future of large organizations。
The opening of communications can obscure the mysterious post-modernity of industry and management
China net: "can big businesses become entrepreneurial?" in this forum, where strategic management scholars argued that business had to defeat bureaucracy, citing the case of the haile group, he said: “hell is a very imaginative company that gives every employee the opportunity to become an entrepreneur and we need to learn from innovation and entrepreneurship.” prior to this, professor christian bush of the london school of political and economics agreed that “the hale model may become the next model of society”, asking what exactly does the hale model mean for europe
Roqingqi: the developed countries represented by europe have not fundamentally moved in management theory and practice, and large industrial organizations are within the scope of the organization described by max weber and chandler. The opening of the chinese market has to some extent stabilized the structure of large industrial organizations in the west. The dominance of high-quality factors of production and productive resources has also left these large industrial organizations with little interest in changing their structure. The construction of digital technology facilities for internet-type companies is like new buildings built next to old urban areas, as if they were new buildings, and their impact on the city as a whole is simply expanding city space, which today is a serious theoretical loss of sight, as einstein once said. Yes, on grand narratives, we have never seen things in theoretical terms, and we have never despised our intuitiveness. From the information presented at the forum, europe is still using a framework of historic organizations to look at global change, from which point of view europe has not seen any change in the world, not in the world itself, and western management theory has become, in a sense, the mirror of history, not even the fog before it。
For example, europe’s management theory community has been holding up the banner of anti-bureaucraticism. The environment in which the organization survives has changed dramatically, with human history ushering in an era of comprehensive, free, non-linear communications. Individuals believe that openness to communications can appall the mysterious post-modernity of industry and management: the confusion of our management theory can be answered in the global openness of communication. Haile is more important to europe than all the so-called internet companies on the market have had an impact on europe, directly touching the bottom of europe's economy: the transformation of the industrial sector. As the american philosopher dewey once said, raising issues is the most effective way to influence later thinking. Haile is the first enterprise in the world to raise the issue of the open transformation of large industrial organizations, and its main practice is to address the openness of industrial organizations, as professor christian bush of the london school of political and economics argues, “the hale model may become the next model of society, a project that can provide a mirror for the transformation of large industrial organizations around the globe, and which deserves our expectations。
