It is not some kind of ownership or a particular expert who opposes it, but rather public opinion manipulation and policy lobbying at the expense of ordinary people, disregarding facts and logic。
In the past few months, zhang xuefeng’s criticism of the media profession, combined with the cooperation of the press outlets this year, has provided zhang xuefeng with an ongoing debate from false pretenses to starving to death, and some have finally been silenced and validated, while others have received continuous education combined with theoretical practice, which is a typical example of breaking the western elite’s intellectual monopoly。
The financial and economic sphere of the author is also a major area of westernization elite monopoly, which is more directly related to the property interests of everyone than the news industry. And because of the natural complexity of the economic phenomenon, many financial statements sound very reasonable and “for the sake of the people”, and in fact ordinary people are sold to help count money。
In articles such as balance sheet recession, baguilan and real estate, writers have criticized many misleading financial and economic statements in the hope of helping ordinary people to understand their positions of interest and what policies help to advance their interests. Today, we follow our roots to make a collection of financial and economic scribes who make these statements。
“intellectuals must be integrated with the masses of workers and farmers” because knowledge acquired by intellectuals cannot be translated into social products without a specific production process, nor can intellectuals themselves be rewarded. Some intellectuals have learned the truth, but have found that the social returns from the combination of power and capital are more substantial than those from the industrial and agricultural communities, and that the patriarchs of the various industries have emerged。
The knowledge and discourse of economists (including the broader economics of finance, commerce, etc.) can directly help employers to expand their power over social resources, and are among the best-paid among scribes. Economists like summers, who are well-established in the rotating united states, can direct themselves to high-ranking officials, such as the treasury secretary, the chairman of the fed, the president’s economic adviser, and control the flow of financial and economic resources across society。
Chinese economists cannot take steps within the system of government, and the paradigm of “academic officials” is very different from academic methodology. The most closely dependent economists come from public research institutions in non-university institutions, which cannot directly influence policy, speak out and interpret policy, have weak economic perceptions of ordinary people and are often angered by poor standards。
The scribes who depend on capital are different. As a result of economics education in recent decades, economists with western mainstream economics hammers have seen our economy beset with nails and are more critical. Moreover, they are more flexible in their statements and more tied to the market media, which can always be dramatic, creating widespread social outreach and shaping the financial and public opinion environment and the inertia of thinking that serves the interests of the gold owners behind them。
Instead of underestimating the influence of market rhetoric within the system, in recent years, large-scale tax cuts, mortgages, etc. Have been introduced into market opinion and eventually fed into the system's decision-making processes and policies, with profound implications for the interests of all ordinary people。
So, financial and economic discourse, dependent on capital, deserves the most vigilance, distinction and criticism from us all. In the context of recent years, the author has observed the statements of the financial and economic media and has taken seven different forms of life among the scribes。
Frenzy
This is the earliest version of the financial and economic scribes, which can be said to be the “rivers of the economy”. The new business class needs to get the legitimacy of their actions. In front of god, kos, hayek, friedman and others, who can translate the neo-liberal “biblical” more into the country is the great and brave economist。
Economists of that age brought religious fanaticism to converts, and all statements were filled with extreme blindness, critical of the “original sin” of socialist public ownership, and praised the sanctity and efficiency of private capital. Zhang's classic statement that “corruption benefits economic development” is based on the fact that corruption cedes public assets and social power to private enterprises and that everything will be all right once privatized, at an acceptable cost。
Like the great master of the people’s republic, queen’sists benefit from the huge gap in the level of economic research at home and abroad, and can become “masters of the economy” if they leave the country early enough to learn basic model theory, or even in the evening of a foreign economist, whose research capacity is so low that they can only survive by studying. The zhang plution must call itself a link to koss, and zhang wai-cai will only have those neo-liberal slogans, even rereading them in the title for a few years。
Fortunately, the chinese government had not fully accepted their madness and had spared no effort to create its own martyrdom image and strengthen its religious outreach. A young man who was especially fond of being beaten with “truths” never said what he said, how officials criticized him for giving public knowledge, and probably knew that his “truths” were simply “truths”。
Their sermons have generally been successful, placing the mark on generations of minds. Whatever the facts, whether they are beneficiaries or not, they are divided, private, and good and right, and they are the starting point for many, if not many, of policy thinking. But their academic level is so bad that they are now offered as a flag of thought to avoid becoming “high black” in too many specific subjects。
Manipulate data
In this era of growing disloyalism, the financial and economic scribes must also use at least more credible means to increase the dissemination and persuasiveness of their words in order to defend the interests of the gold-rich。
Many internet users now have a sense of “views need to be supported by arguments”, but they do not yet have the initiative and the ability to validate arguments, and many scribes have drilled into this void, adding a large number of data charts to the articles to discredit non-professional readers, but they are in fact biased in their references and interpretations. The next two articles, "yo man", are the conglomerates of such tactics。
Before and after the spring of 2023, yin sword wrote two articles criticizing the government for taking too much of the economy. In china why chinese do not consume, yin kensai claimed that income inequality within the population had little effect on consumption in china, because china's gini coefficient was 0. 385, and income was very equal, and this figure was released:
It's the dumbest trick in the manipulation of data. Data fraud. The figure in the figure is the world bank's consumption gini coefficient, which only reflects differences in consumption levels among the population and does not reflect income disparities. China's cheap public service system guarantees relative equity in consumption, but the official gini coefficient, published by the national institute of statistics, has reached 0. 465。
In "where's the money of finance" , yin kendai throws theoretics: chinese finance is a ghost, and welfare spending is lower than in india。
This is the second move: a live caliber. China’s welfare spending is only one small fiscal item, with no regard for welfare expenditure such as public education and health care, while other countries have adopted a very broad-calibre comparison with china. If china's welfare is really less than our 11-year-old indian life expectancy, why didn't yin kendai pass
Turning back to non-consumption, yin kensai also used the most explicit technique: the non-conformity. He said that chinese property income represented only 4 per cent of total income, and if it increased to 22 per cent of the united states level, the chinese would dare to consume it
This scheme obscures the logic behind the data, and readers who lack specialized knowledge can easily be led astray. Think about it, why can american money be converted into purchasing power when it comes to the stock market? Chinese are working hard to produce cheap goods. So who can the 1. 4 billion chinese make money in the stock market that is empty
The data in these two articles demonstrate that there are so many loopholes that they still win a lot of praise on many platforms, showing how easy it is to manipulate the data. As the chief economist of the bank of zhexiang, ying zhexiang, he held the post of chairman of the shanghai financial and development laboratory. The two articles, "yao man", were not only published in the public domain of a subsidiary of the social science institute, but also received accreditation from the imperial army of radio freedom xx, with impressive skill on three boats。
Logical confusion
There are many counterintuitive conclusions in economic theory, behind which there is a whole set of mathematical reasoning for self-interest. Many people, including pens, who have first come across these logics feel very novel, very strict, and very deep, immediately denigrate the common sense of life and engage in “reasonable science”. Some patriarchs do their job by selling the new sense of wonder and superiority of economics 101。
At the height of the domestic epidemic in 2020, the famous lecturer of economics, 101, xue mt., spoke amazingly: the mask should not be priced, but should be praised to those who have lost money in the rich countries. Because, under price regulation mechanisms, high-price masks can attract more major producers to “help” others in national distress - it's the most classic liberalist tone, and selfish behaviour automatically lends itself to it。
It's not a genre
The opportunity to stop blinding such logic lies in the discovery that sophisticated models are not validated by economic realities. For some office economists, the mask appears automatically on the shelf at a time when prices are raised, without complex processes and lengthy periods of time. Moreover, price signals have proved to be inadequate and unnecessary conditions for an increase in the supply of masks, none of which is in production, and the shortage of masks has ultimately been solved by a limited price increase by national organizations; and on the other side of the ocean, where the masks have increased freely, until they are repainted, no indigenous mask capacity has been established。
Economics, of course, cannot be wronged too much, after all, when market structure theory clearly states that, in less than fully competitive markets, producers will keep production below the best levels of society and thus maintain high prices. The knowledge base is not strong enough to recognize a completely competitive market with two threads, and “just as limited” knowledge allows him to “just” make the best suggestion for the mask。
The same logic is inexplicable, as manquin claimed in the economics doctrine, that drug demand is too weak to reduce drug-related crime - this confuses the low demand elasticity of drug use among individual addicts, but the relative resilience of the entire society against drug abuse is high, and the number of drug victims will increase significantly if drugs are released。
For example, a system of incentives that does not fix latrines in affordable housing, and a porridge of sand — the poor, who do not have to do anything wrong — will lead to a general decline in social motivation。
In the face of the cynicic rhetoric, the best defense is to “think a few steps”. By comparing the trajectory of their logical events with the direction of the real world, if similar events in history or abroad have not developed according to their logic, they claim that the result is only a large pie。
Moreover, rather than abandoning their own social value judgements, scribes are good at covering their value positions with theoretical logic that appears to be “objective” and instead ask each other to give up their value positions. For example, there are a number of models and empirical studies that oppose the government's establishment of minimum wages, as this will encourage enterprises to reduce their employment to the detriment of workers。
As workers, the question may be asked: is there a equivalence between the survival pressure of the labour force and the ability to negotiate contracts? Is it beneficial to increase social productivity for an enterprise that can profit from unlimited wage reductions? If both answers are available, then the responsibility for the “minimum wage to the detriment of workers' rights” should be attributed to the government or to inefficient enterprises that should be eliminated
History books
All history is a contemporary one, and the importance of the right to historical interpretation can never be more clear to the scribes. Economists such as asimoglu have used many quantitative historical methods to argue that developed countries are rich because the system of protecting property rights is good and former colonial countries are poor, not because of the exploitation of their own countries, but because of their systems. What system is good? Of course, the more like the western system, the better
The final collection of asimoglu’s economic history studies is a generation of institution-decisive bibles, “why the state fails”. It not only provides a “reasonable and objective” academic basis for the west to cover up the bloody raw accumulation and promote privatization liberalization, but also serves as a panacea for economic history research: by linking a new novelty with the protection of private property rights through historical stories, measurement models prove that the better the system, the better the economy。
This is the story of the country's invasion of this template: the higher the degree of westernization, the better the protection of property rights, the more advanced the christian primary education in china is, the greater the economic development. The so-called quantitative chinese economic history studies carried out in hong kong by scholars like chen zhiwu are the same set and fixed conclusions。
The traditional channels have not been ignored by the royalists, and the country's representatives are the “elite” wu xiaobo. Four words are enough to sum up the thrust of all his economic history: the retreat of the nation. In the gains and losses of generations of economic change, wu xiaobo introduced modern economic concepts such as mercantilist, keynesianism and free markets into ancient times, with the fundamental aim of insulating the contemporary economic system。
There is nothing more typical than a fierce criticism of wang ansuk's efforts to stifle business freedom, to throw out the idea of a “economically centralized state”, and how can he insinuate to criticize his own gold lords with the help of his own elite
Forty years of extortion has a typical “golden 1980s” historical view, although less than the “corruption prostheses”, and marketization and private enterprises are unquestioned political correctness. The chaos of the social order, the incentive-led collapse brought about by the change, the lay-off workers who were thrown into the ground as a burden, and the barbarity of the times and the pain of ordinary people have been downplayed。
The 1980s were the slowest years of growth in per capita life expectancy in china
Whether it is an academic paper or a popular reading, a great deal of economic history is not written as vinyl. As long as there is more historical macro-visions, they may be tactful or crude: as long as it is understood that the united states and the west intervened in, blocked, and destabilized former colonial countries after the war, it will not believe that “the economy is bad because the system is bad.” and the readers who are familiar with china’s hao-min history change will naturally not think that the “people” who are called “regression” will turn to the civilian population。
Left and right
In the age of internet mass media, the evaluation of ordinary people is crucial to the reputation and dissemination of experts. It is not good for some economists to pick on the social media and raise their profile and pay their salaries on the other side of the story, and to have the right hand and the right hand。
Yaoyang, president of the north power, is probably the most popular of the country's top economists, and has often made media comments on topical economic topics. Looking at the overall tone of the speech, he has gained wide appreciation for his attempts to shape the situation with ordinary people, circumvent the common mined areas, and oppose the high school career diversion (though the author wants to talk, does president yao not want to make a statement about the fundamental problem of blue-collar workers being locked down as low-income people?), but there is also a scene of “young people don't lock themselves up in their houses”。
Young people are urged not to lock themselves up in their homes in yaoyang and seem reluctant to see real estate companies lose. In his domestic interviews, he was cautiously critical of the policy, classifying as “lessons learned” the regulation to contain the expansion of real estate debt and advocating an overheating tolerance of 5 per cent inflation. When he arrived in some offshore media, his caliber was turned into a desperate urge to cancel the three red lines and use social savings to pay for the irrational expansion of housing enterprises. An immediate increase in the price of a commodity house after the recognition of a dwelling is sufficient proof that the “price reduction saves itself” is a cover and focuses on other policies that guarantee that the company will not have to reduce the price or survive。
As president of the national development bank, yaoyang regularly publishes the main melody articles in national journals and is invited to make a positive assessment of the chinese economy on the official side. Thesis by economics international's flagship aer, " rising and declining local elections in china " , has changed dramatically: china's “autonomous government” suppressed rural democratic autonomy through reforms to strengthen rural fiscal expenditure management in 2003. Readers with experience in rural life have a history of chaos and barbarism at the grass-roots level, but the papers from yaoyang have made the policy of healing the mess a western favorite story。
Title of the paper: the rise and fall of local actions in china
Of course, it can be argued that the chinese-related papers published on aer are all of this tone, and the main contribution of yaoyang to the papers is the provision of data clouds. But in the face of the temptation of signing the most famous aer, president yao has lost the right energy to speak on the national media. There are quite a few chinese economists who master two sets of narratives in foreign publishers and domestic media. Who knows which is true and which is a play
Inverse bedring
In 2018, wu xiaoping, the so-called “renowned economist”, published atheism: it was time for the private economy to leave. In fact, the long-standing media stance of professor zhou's old pyke marxist school, “the ultimate ideal is the eradication of private ownership”, has always provoked the shock of the royal scribe。
But the title of wu xiaoping is “cicc founders of retail and wealth management business, financial commentators, business observers, online financiers” and, no matter how well he became a “renowned economist” who could not possibly believe in marx's capital-market winner, how come he suddenly starts eating
This is an obvious backlash of black pr: all the country's media experts have come to the fore. Tears, in addition to the many obscenities of the foreign media, have been smitten with ideological blackouts and internal outreach as if private enterprises were about to be wiped out. Until now, the top-ranking officials have consistently rejected the “off-the-shelf rhetoric” and have successively put in place a policy of plagiarizing private enterprises to prove themselves innocent。
Even without the bait to show up, financial and economic scribes will take advantage of all critical statements to distort and exaggerate, and take advantage of the golden master, who has powerful public opinion resources, to create a pitiful lamb for the privilege of not being criticized。
Since 2020, the state has managed to increase the risk of social costs and even endanger the security of the state by industrial enterprises such as real estate, pedagogy, ants' gold suits and dripping, and an increasing number of internet users have been able to argue for the strengths and weaknesses of civil enterprises and express criticism of immoral and illegal business practices. However, these legitimate criticisms came to the mouth of some experts, and some of them became “extremely left speech”, “defamation” and “defending the confidence of private entrepreneurs”。
“criticism is meaningless,” the scribes often shout at institutions, but they wait for the voices of criticism of public enterprises to be “boiled with swords”! The so-called unfriendly is a replica of soviet jokes: he slanders private entrepreneurs! What did he say? He told me what an entrepreneur had done
Indeed, companies that have been criticized by public opinion have a great deal of legal and public relations capacity, and there is a great variety of means, such as heat searches, water arms control reviews and the southern pepsi winners. But now, a kid with a large waist runs to his teacher every day to cry and complain that his skinny and small classmates are scolding him every day and that the teacher is tired of asking the latter to correct his mistakes. This does not build the confidence of entrepreneurs, but inevitably undermines the confidence of consumers and workers。
It's going to be one
We have already listed six types of patriarchy, but it is difficult for the last one to sum up in a single way, because they say business, and the technocratic instrument is always available and is itself a model for walking。
He is the best financial professional who knows how to use the internet for dissemination and the best financial argument in red v. In 2017, when he was admitted to office on a multi-million-year salary scale, he was given a social focus that went beyond the financial and economic profession. Since then, he has worked hard to run social platforms, such as the public domain, to build “real economics”, “conscience economists” and have a large network of people who are manipulating the perception of current financial hotspots。
In one of these articles, we have analysed in detail how ren zepin's “government took 70 per cent of the house price” riots manipulated the data and dumped high-priced pots from the realtor to the government. As a result of this discussion in 2016, a large number of internet users have found out that they are outraged, and until now the rumour that “the government is responsible for housing prices” still dominates public opinion under the real estate issue。
By virtue of its long and deep tillage and non-death, in 2017, zephyng received a high wage, and zephyng's royal talent was indeed such a high salary。
In any case, ren zepin's assertion that “real estate looks at people for the long term” is correct, so his house-selling strategy is fundamental and direct. The ren zepin team publishes several population studies every year, which strongly call for the liberalization of fertility restrictions and the increase of maternity benefits (which, of course, do not mention the price of the house) and receive numerous “consciences”. High house prices were the best contraceptive pill, and the manufacturer of contraceptives had become a reproductive hero, a joke that was too black to be in hell。
Victims have expressed their understanding of the perpetrators and their willingness to continue to suffer for generations to come
It was the first time that i realized that there could be problems with a constant debt, and it came from 19 years of zeppein's frenzy calling for a reduction in interest rates. The requirement to reduce the cost of the funds was a mandatory course and a verbal sentence for all capital markets, but at that time he had exhausted all means of argument. The ultra-high frequency (uhf), the extreme dew, and the no-limit call for water had to raise doubts that his party had been unable to pay interest。
There's only two words in the line: water
That year, driven by pork prices, inflation in the country was at its highest level in eight years and at 4. 5 per cent in the second half of the year. Ren zepin insisted that “the pork is deflation and cannot be sacrificed to the national economy for a pig” and that there are only three things to deal with: a drop in interest rates, a drop in interest rates, or a drop in interest rates. In fact, core inflation excluding food energy was 1. 4 per cent, and renzeping redefined deflation. The subtext of his brand, the golden word, is nothing but a debt expansion that cannot be sacrificed for the poor。
In 2020, renze ping pushed the new infrastructure instead of stimulating consumption. After all, it was only by continuing to rely on investment that he could push up housing prices and expand the borrowing space. Despite a desperate call for water to survive the group debt, the boss's death was too late for him to succeed in jumping before the constant explosion in june 21 and later in writing “suspiciously” to forget the fall in interest rates。
In january 2022, ren zepin suggested that “two trillion dollars per year, 50 million more than 10 years of life, should be printed” and that his absurdity should finally be revealed. The irony of this turn-over is that it was because the scribes of finance and finance have for more than a decade stigmatized the “4 trillions” project, and the notion that printing money is harmful to the economy, that when they really needed to call for the rescue of the king, they discovered that they had been stoned to their feet。
Now, ren zepin, who can't sell the shampoo, lies flat, and occasionally leaves out the weirdness of “the price of the house cannot rise, the price of the house cannot rise”. In fact, ordinary people don't mind telling ren zepin how to win the nobel prize: don't think about the people's money, you and the gold lords throw up the wrong money to clean up the mess。
Finally, the author would like to explain that the paper neither covers the full face of all financial and scribes nor is it intended to extend criticism to the entire academic community of economics. In ivory towers, mainstream economics is at least decent, and many theoretical or empirical studies have criticized market distortions and corporate misconduct. The problem is that the individual self-interest of the patriarchy constitutes a collective lack of awareness in the economics community, with more of the economic discourse that favours capital interests being channelled into society and decision-making。
The enormous ills of institutions cannot be denied, but their contribution cannot be killed with a single stick; the positive role of capital and private enterprises cannot be replaced, but there cannot be no brainwashing. It is not some kind of ownership or a particular expert who opposes it, but rather public opinion manipulation and policy lobbying at the expense of ordinary people, disregarding facts and logic. The hope is to help non-professionals to remain sober in public opinion, which is how to combine financial and financial knowledge with the workforce。
"assist the land of ostrich!"
Awards
Wyzxwk. Com
Your reward will be used for daily running and maintenance of the website。
Help us set up a website and promote red culture
