I've been training for almost five years. I've got more than 300 setsSecurity knowledge contestThreshold. Every year, companies organize competitions, and new colleagues come to ask me the same thing — where to find it, how to get enough of it for a limited period of time. This is my way of filtering the library and setting the rhythm of the brushes, not turning around。
Where's the security library
Don't come up here looking for the security contest collection and getting upset at hundreds of pages of PDF. I now have the habit of cross-validating through three channels: the annual pilot of the safety production act issued by the ministry of emergency management's network of officials, the reprogramming of the unit's accident cases for almost three years, and the job safety norms issued by industry associations. These three topics cover the three dimensions of regulation, practical judgement and hazard identification, respectively, and are basically the target of 80 per cent of the competition. If you do business in-house training, then go over the sop manual of your department and take out the entries about the security red line, it's the private library that suits your scene。
And there's a stupid but special way of doing it — going through your workshop, your site, or your lab's records of the risk. The title of the actual case is more relevant than the standard subject in any educational material. This method was used last year to sort out 40 scenarios from three monthly inspection records, and the average team score increased by 11 points over the previous year, two of which were the chemical spill that we ourselves handled last month。
What about the security library
I've never done a team brush. At the rhythm, the subject library will be cut into four modules: error and error judgement, empty selection, scenario analysis, emergency disposal sequencing. Only the first two modules were painted during the first three days, with the goal of making zero errors in pure memory-type topics, and of rewriting those that were wrong on the day 15 minutes before the close of work. Don't underestimate this move. It's much more useful than a ten-time resolution。
The next three days will focus on situation analysis and emergency disposal. It doesn't work on a hard back. It has to be the sameOperation processDraw it on paperI don't know. For example, when you're done with the chemical leak, you're done with the "class-alarm-dile-recycling" four steps, and you can quickly lock up the answer regardless of how the subject changes. Three complete simulations for the last two daysMistakes classified by points of viewAnd focus on the double. I've seen too many people brushing 500 questions or hanging on the scenario, and the root is not responding to the operating process costs。
The competition says you don't have a lot of paperwork, but you know what to do with the first step. It's better to brush it ten times than to really take the operational logic behind every wrong question. If you're here, it's the right thing to do. You can keep your life。
