A lot of people were fired from their jobs, and they agreed, "i've been working for years and i've been old."Social securityIt's not enough to pay for 15 yearsPensionCount it out a lot less. More than that, you've been in labor arbitration for eight yearsLength of serviceThe social security board, however, only admits five years of contributions, and the two systems are completely independent and confusedRetirementA lot of people went through the test。
The length of service and pension contributions are two separate systems
The length of work is governed by the law on labour contracts, the core purpose of which is to calculate financial compensation, the number of days of annual leave, the length of medical care, and to determine whether an indefinite contract can be concluded. You have worked in a company for eight years, and the company dismisses you illegally, with compensation based on eight months ' pay, which is the length of service. It only determines whether there is a labour relationship between you and your employer, not directly related to the non-payment of social security。
The years of contributions to old-age insurance are administered by the social security institute and the social security department for the sole purpose of accounting for monthly pensions after retirement. It does not see whether you are on duty, but only whether there are actual contribution records in the social security account. In the same paragraph, 2019 to 2024, the labour arbitration concluded that you had five years of service, but the iess account found that the company had not paid its social security contributions for the same three years. At the same time, the two sets of results, the missing part of which is the focus of the controversy。
Factual labour relations are the only threshold for age determination
A working relationship is established as long as it proves that you actually work at the workplace, receive a salary and are managed by the unit. Even if the unit has not paid a penny, you have made a labour arbitration claim for annual leave compensation or financial compensation for the termination of the contract, which is also accounted for on the basis of the number of years of actual service. The non-payment of social security by an employer is an offence of its own and cannot, in turn, negate your working age, which is a separate legal relationship。
Key evidence in the exercise includes labour contracts, money bank flow, attendance card records, photographs of work clothes, testimony from colleagues, etc. Even if there is no paper contract in hand, the electronic records of work placements, claims clearances, mail notices and other documents in the letter complement the proof of labour relations. The more complete the material, the more firm the determination of the length of service in arbitration and litigation, the greater the entitlement to financial compensation, medical treatment and contracts of unlimited duration。
It was a hard line in 1986
Prior to october 1986, fixed-term workers employed by state-owned enterprises were eligible for direct recognition as "payable years", without the requirement of a record of actual contributions. However, contract workers recruited after october 1986 do not, in principle, have natural years of contribution. Many of the older employees were pre-retired at the time of the pre-retirement examination by flipping the 1990 call forms to take full account of 30 years, which resulted in the social security board accepting only the portion of the actual contributions after implementation, which was cut off directly。
An old-term contract worker who had joined a state enterprise in 1988 had been working for 10 years and had never been insured by his employer. At the time of retirement accounting, the social security sector only accepts the number of years in which the contributions are recorded, which is all invalid. He expected the 30-year contribution to be 20 years, with a monthly pension of nearly $800. The file contains a list of job offers and work records, but it does not count if there is no record of contributions, which is the most vulnerable pit for old contract workers since 1986。
I don't want to be merged
In the same unit, temporary work within the scheme is carried out and subsequently converted to contract workers within the unit, without a cut-off and with a formal recruitment procedure for the files, which can be combined to calculate the continuous length of service. However, it is established in the sub-paragraph on the length of old-age contributions that the period of temporary work prior to the implementation of the integrated system is considered to be equivalent to the period of contribution, and that the period of temporary work after the implementation of the integrated system is not counted as the period of contribution。
The situation is completely different across units. You have worked in unit a for three years on a temporary basis, and after your separation you have been transferred to unit b for three years. There is no continuation of labour relations between the two units, and social security is also a separate account, which can only be accounted for separately at retirement. It is therefore important to confirm whether the social security relationship has been transferred and renewed upon separation from service, otherwise the previous contribution record could easily be lost。
These periods are not valid years
Social security is the most typical category. You're not actually in work, you're just putting a name on social security, which is a fictional labour relationship. The length of service is not recognized at the labour level, nor can the age of contributions be determined at the age of old age, and once it has been established that it also involves social security fraud, the old-age pension has been fully recovered. In addition, periods of automatic separation from service, dismissal from employment and imprisonment, regardless of length of service or old-age contributions, are not included in the validity period。
There is also a common pattern of missing materials. Prior to the retirement of an old contract worker, the social security department required the original materials such as a job search form, a change of approval form, a calendar salary adjustment, a transfer order, etc., for the pre-referral of files, which could not be identified without a corresponding period of time. Many people do not usually care about the files, but wait until they retire and find that only the five years from 1995 to 2000 did not have a work permit, and that those five years are not counted directly, and that the pension has shrunk with regret。
Once dismissed, the material should be prepared in advance
If you are still in the workforce, you are afraid of being dismissed for accounting for annual leave, medical treatment, financial compensation, with a focus on collecting evidence of labour use. Labour contracts, entry forms, calendar year attendance records, payroll bank flow, work card photographs, colleagues' micro-credit work records, all of which are kept back-up. Once the company has initiated the downsizing, hr may immediately take back or destroy the paper material. The electronic backup is your last line of defence, so let's not lose sight of the evidence。
In the case of older contract workers who entered the service after 1986, they must go to the social security window to check for actual contributions and check monthly whether they have been terminated. At the same time, the register of applications, the regular form and the calendar year salary approval form were drawn up at the archives to confirm the completeness of the material. It was found that the cut-off period would be too late to contact the original unit to apply for or to follow the individual's pay-off route until the day of the retirement review。
Are you or the old man in the family a contract worker who entered the workforce after 1986? Has there ever been a record of a period of service that the social security board does not recognize? The comment section talks about your experience and praises the collection for pre-retirement checks。
