"what's the intervention? Can you cure cancer?" people in the clinic ask me, "well, i've always felt like you're talking about the word, like you're updating the system button on your phone."
I'm familiar and strange, and i'm afraid i'll have to go in and see if i'm wrong. Today, let's just say once, what's involved in therapy, it doesn't work, it's not a car for every tumor patient。
Involvement in treatment sounds like "a knife is not an operation." strictly speaking, it does “not go through the knife”, but it does not have less. The doctor passed a very fine catheter
It usually goes from a leg vein to a part of the body, sending the medicine, freeze, thermal energy or particles precisely to the target, in other words, "no surgery."PrecisionI'm sorry。
Traditional surgical interventions are less than frontal and more like precision snipers by special forces. The tumor is controlled by “points” and recovered quickly. Interventions are useful when many patients are at high risk of surgery or are unable to operate. It is not an alternative therapy, but a real and important option。
There are those who see intervention as a “last resort”, a somewhat misleading notion. In clinical settings, intervention can often be considered in early years for partially controlled cancers such as liver, lung, kidney and pancreas。
It's not a fallout, it's an early formation. It is also a door, especially for older persons who cannot withstand chemotherapy. Not all tumors are suitable for intervention。
We need to look at the location of the tumor, the direction of the veins, whether it's moved far or not, and the physical condition. Breast cancer, tumours in the blood system, for example, are now almost non-existent in treatment pathways. It's not a "one-size-fits-all key" but a "precision tool." misuse is waste, delay or even trouble。
Another common area of error is the use of intervention as a “no cure”. It's not right either. It's an opening, but small and invisible. The catheter goes into the body, the medicine goes in
The risk of local death, post-operative heat, pain, infection is a solid “micro-surgery” that cannot be taken lightly because it is “unopened”。
Some people see “involved in chemotherapy” as an alternative to intravenous drops. It's not fair. The intervention in chemotherapy is the direct injection of drugs into the oncology vein
The concentration was higher and hit harder, but its coverage was limited. If tumours are broken up like dandelions, floating everywhere, full-body chemotherapy and target medicine are useful。
A lot of people have heard of the term “infusion, decomposition, embolism”, which is bigger. To put it simply, “infusion” is a dose, “embolism” is a clogged vein that starves a tumor, and “indigestion” is the use of cold heat to burn a tumor cell or freeze to death. Different techniques are used in different battle areas, and doctors are required to take into account the type, location, size of the tumor。
Some tumours, such as those in the middle of the liver, those in the back of the kidney, and those on the side of the pancreas, suffer as soon as the operation moves the surrounding organs. This is a time when interventions can be directed from the veins
It's like walking through the main door, climbing through the back door and not destroying the surroundings, and the doctor's "technological work" is here. I'm telling the truth. It's a lie。
The intervention was calm, but after the operation, there was some reaction, with heat, nausea, abdominal swelling and stress. These symptoms, however, tend to abate for two or three days, much more than a knife. The high rate of post-operative recovery is its strength。
Every time we talk about intervention, there are others who are concerned that “are there side effects?” of course there are. None of the treatments are “clean and clean costs”. Intervention can cause inflammation, perforation, death of the embolism and impaired liver function. These risks are not common, but each deserves an early assessment and post-operative observation。
Do not be confused by the so-called “micro-intensity”, which is a technically demanding tool. Doctors are skilled and can be counterproductive if the catheters are missed, misplaced, and placed in the wrong veins。
What you do is "a high-level spot," not "a big blind-fired water gun." the choice of hospitals and experienced teams is more important than anything. We've seen an old man in clinical terms. Hepatic cancer, re-emergence
The risk of a major operation is extremely high. At one point, the family tried to give up by intervening to open the road, using a “slush + microball embolism” to control the tumor and then recommenced the whole body for more than three years. Not who can be cured, but an opportunity to flip。
There is also a young man, a lung gland carcinoma, who reacts to chemotherapy, who is afraid to heal and who is insominated all night. Hepatic injections and freezing and digestion were then tested, post-oppression discomfort, tumours reduced, body energy returned and psychological support was provided. Intervention sometimes goes beyond technology itself; it is the confidence of treatment and the step of “up to the top”。
At the end of the day, intervention is not “the alternative”, but combined with other treatments. The medical profession has long refrained from saying, “what kind of treatment is the best,” but what combination can win。
In local therapy, intervention has always been the invisible but team-driven member. It was never the lead, but never absent。
It is not until the end of the disease that “up-to-up intervention” can be considered for many early tumours, post-operative consolidation, intervals between chemotherapy and even for the mitigation period. The first line of treatment, provided that it is used in a timely and early manner, is no less effective than the traditional means. The key is “early assessment, early intervention and early benefit”。
I know a lot of people are afraid of surgery, chemotherapy, side effects, and it turns out that the good treatment is "no cure," and it's not the treatment that's really lacking many times
It is the barrier between transparency and understanding of information. Intervention is not an alien, it is an increasingly common clinical path that you should understand。
Don't wait for the doctor to say, “just try to get involved”, when the best window is usually missed. The treatment that is truly effective has never been accompanied by “no choice” but by a possible and early distribution at every stage。
It's not just a medical strategy, it's life's respect for itself. Interventions will continue to develop in the future, with minor innovations, accompanying drugs and operating equipment being upgraded. In some cases, it becomes even an option for “not being fully toxic”, “not being a substitute”. An increasing number of young doctors have also begun to specialize in this area, which is a newer medical treatment and the potential for patients to survive for many years。
