There is also a difference of opinion among scholars, such as hwang hao, who says: “the existence or absence of ieda has been the subject of much debate, and much of it has not been considered from the larger point of view. The greatest reason for denying ida's claim is that the landless son of zhou zhou is the same. Zhou is a slave society. What is the feudalist? The son of god is a land, a land, a land, and a nation. There's land for you, there's land for you, there's land for you, there's land for you, not for you. The land within the kingdom is also given to the doctor and not to the gods. The land is divided over time, there is little to live, and god has given the land to the people, and the practice of well-doing is preferable? Some commentators say that the son of god, though he has no land to give to the people, has become the rule of the week: “under the heavens, the land of the king, the land of the land, the land of the king, the land of the king.” gai can enact laws and regulations to give effect to them without the need to grant citizenship in person. Yes, the centralization of zhou is relative, not absolute, and may not be necessary. And the whole world is in the middle of it. But zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhu zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhu zhu zhu zhu zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhou zhu zhou zhu zhu zhu zhu zhu zhu zhu zi zi zhu zun zhu zhu zun zhu zhu zhu zhu zun zun zun zun zun there is no relationship between the people and the son of god except in one instance or in another, and the son of god and none of the world, and not in the hereafter. The gods don't ask. In fact, there is no right to ask. For example, in the case of the teachings, the final brother and master of ludo, qi jin and other countries, the passing of the same is done by the father and the son, regardless of the circumstances, and is done in the same manner as in the case of the report, and in the case of the zhao emperor in may, and in the case of the luber bird for three years. In the absence of a law, the people of zhou may not be governed, but rather by the rules of ida, zhou, and the rules of the world? The application of the ida system must be premised on the availability of sufficient land for the heavens and the sound concentration of central authority, which, in the absence of these two points, is somehow carried out.”
