The five-year short-acting pill, which was taken after the wedding, was a direct shock to many people by taking them. There's a more fundamental question behind the controversy -- do you really understand the principles of the short-acting pill
A dynamic health dispute
Netizens shared it on social platforms, stating that they had been taking short-acting contraceptives since marriage, that they were suspended only when they were ready for pregnancy, and that they had been on them for five years after the birth of the second child. She and her husband, sanbao, are 25 years old and 58 years old this year, and the couple have made it clear that they have no intention of having children in the short term。
As soon as it came out, the comment area blew up the pot. The first reaction of many internet users was to worry about her, who felt that taking medication for long periods of time would hurt her body and would be well placed to choose another method of contraception without having to pay for her health. There are also a number of queries as to whether prolonged and uninterrupted drug use will leave invisible after-effects, and some problems will come to light later in life。
How does the short-acting pill work
The core principle of the short-acting contraceptive pill is a combination of low doses of estrogen and gestational hormone, which leads to a miscalculation of the body as having been pregnant, thereby inhibiting the ovulation, while thinning the uterine membranes, thickening the cervical mucus and making it difficult to penetrate sperm. It is not an after-action remedy, but a regular daily dose to maintain a relatively stable hormone level, which is manageable throughout the cycle。
Following cyclical adherence, most women's menstruation moves into a predictable rhythm and becomes more regular. For a large number of people suffering from menstruation and pain, regular drug use improves symptoms significantly. This is also why many gynaecologists, in some cases, refer short-acting drugs to patients as a supplement to menstruation cycles。
Emergency drugs and short-acting drugs are not the same thing
Many people mix the short-acting pill with the emergency pill, which is considered to be a pill and which must hurt their body for long periods of time. However, several levels of hormones are different. The emergency medicine is a remedial programme within 72 hours after the event, with one-time large-dose hormones forcing disruption of the ovulation cycle, up to once or twice a year, and must not be used as a routine method of contraception。
Short-acting drugs are a daily full-cycle programme with low single doses and stable internal metabolic pathways that do not produce sharp hormone fluctuations such as emergency drugs. Using the side effects of emergency medicine for short-acting drugs is like taking safety standards for loaded trucks to measure domestic electric cars, which is logically untenable and is the biggest cognitive error in the online debate。
No one can take this for long
Short-acting contraceptives have clear thresholds for application. With a history of haemobolism, uncontrolled hypertension, more than a certain number of daily smokers, and some cases of liver and liver diseases, doctors do not usually recommend such drugs. Age overage combined with a long-term smoking habit, the risks associated with haematosis and cardiovascular activity are further compounded, and drug programmes need to be particularly cautious and unmanageable。
Even if the basic medical check-up is fully met, long-term medication means a review of liver and kidney function, blood resin, blood pressure and coagulation indicators every two years. While many people feel that the effects of hormones on their bodies have changed in a dynamic way in the past few years, it is important not to take a breath in their own head for many years, and that adjustment should be subject to the professional judgement of a doctor。
There's no one right answer to contraceptive methods
Clinically commonly used methods of contraception include at least condoms, intrauterine devices, short-acting contraceptives, and under-cover planting, each of which has clear advantages and slabs. Condoms are ready to be used, with low thresholds, but with high rates of inappropriate failure; the prop is placed for several years at a time, but some people are exposed to irregular bleeding or increased risk of infection。
It may not be appropriate for others to use sound solutions for themselves. The choice of long-term medication is based on a personal decision based on her own medical examination, medical advice and a combination of the rhythm of her life. The outsider only sees the text she sends, does not see her annual medical reports and medical advice, and is not entitled to make health choices for others。
Don't judge me by my knowledge of cyber debris
The most practical reminder of this is that, when it comes to hormonal drugs, it is necessary to go to the regular medical facility for an evaluation, not to finish a post, to get a short video, and to go to a pharmacy to buy medicines for long periods of time. Web-based fragmentation information often simplifies complex issues into a single sentence, which can easily be biased, creating unnecessary panic or blind self-confidence。
Instead of taking time to judge whether or not a person should take a drug, it would be better to take advantage of the fact that he/she has a basic knowledge of contraception, drug taboos and risk checks. The body is your own, and the health programmes that suit others are not always right for you, with a rational view of drugs and a focus on regular examinations, much more than imitating or accusing。
Have you or anyone around you ever stepped on anything because of a misperception about the pill? We would like to talk in the comment area, and if we find it useful, we would like to give a compliment and forward it to those who need it。
